From e80ffb5d91cd3e017b5549e912a4e93f7bf03572 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jamie Bullock <jamie@postlude.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 15:03:21 +0000
Subject: Back to C99 in CFLAGS, but at least we (should) have the C89 option
 if anyone can't make it work with their compiler

---
 configure.in | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'configure.in')

diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 3c5fe4b..9c4abbe 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(simpletest,
 # age to 0.
 XTRACT_SO_VERSION=0:0:0
 
-CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -pedantic -ansi -Wall -Werror -std=c89 -I/usr/local/include"
+CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -pedantic -ansi -Wall -Werror -std=c99 -I/usr/local/include"
 LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -lm"
 
 AC_ARG_WITH(pd_dir,
-- 
cgit v1.2.3